Home Study Effect of protein intake on strength body composition and endocrine changes in strenght athletes - Page 4
Logged as CommonCrawl [Bot] - Logout
background image
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 3(2): 12-18, 2006. (www.sportsnutritionsociety.org)
15
Table 2. Average Daily Dietary Intake
Group Kcal Kcal·BM
-1
CHO
(g)
Protein
(g)
Total
Protein
(g·kg
-1
)
Fat
(g)
%
CHO
%
Protein
% Fat
BL 3181
±
462
31.9 ± 3.1
449 ± 89
118 ± 18
1.19 ±
0.14
102 ±
11.7
56.6 ±
4.3
15.0 ±
2.6
28.9 ±
3.1
RL 3127
±
522
33.6 ± 5.4
394 ± 69
160 ± 20
*
1.74 ±
0.13
106 ±
31
50.3 ±
4.6
*
21.2 ±
3.5
*
30.0 ±
5.0
AL 3200
±
773
33.6 ± 7.6
335 ± 118
*
224 ± 57
*, **
2.36 ±
0.44
109 ±
23
41.0 ±
6.5
*, **
28.6 ±
4.5
*, **
30.8 ±
4.0
BL = below recommended protein intake; RL = recommended protein intake; AL = above recommended protein intake. * =
significantly different (p < 0.05) than BL; ** = significantly different (p < 0.05) than RL


RESULTS

Average daily dietary intake is shown in Table 2. No
significant difference in daily caloric intake was seen
between the groups. However, significant
differences in total and relative protein intake were
seen between all three groups. Significant
differences were also observed in carbohydrate intake
between BL and AL. The protein and carbohydrate
composition of the diet was also significantly
different between all three groups.

No changes from PRE in body mass, lean body mass
or percent body fat were observed in any group, and
no between group differences were observed (see
Table 3). Interestingly, lean body mass was
increased by 1.1 ± 2.2 kg in AL, 0.8 ± 1.5 kg in RL
and no change (0.0 ± 1.6 kg) seen in BL. However,
these changes were not significantly different.
Significant increases in strength from PRE were seen
for all groups in the 1-RM squat and 1-RM bench
press (see Table 3). However, no significant
differences between the groups were seen. Although
strength comparisons showed that subjects in AL
had the largest magnitude in strength improvements
in both 1-RM squat (63% and 22% greater than BL
and RL, respectively) and 1-RM bench press strength
(35% and 42% greater than BL and RL,
respectively), these differences were not statistically
different.

Resting total testosterone, cortisol, T/C ratio, growth
hormone, and IGF-I concentrations are shown in
Figures 1-5, respectively. No significant changes
from PRE were observed in any of the groups, and no
between groups differences were seen in any of the
hormones measured. In addition, no correlations
were seen between testosterone concentrations and
dietary protein intake (r = 0.09) and the
protein/carbohydrate ratio (r = 0.08).

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study was to examine whether
protein intakes above recommended levels (> 2.0
g
kg
-1
day
-1
) provided any additional benefit for
strength and body composition improvements in
strength/power athletes. In addition, the effect of
varying protein intakes on resting hormonal
concentrations was also examined. Results were
unable to show any significant evidence indicating
that protein intakes above 2.0 g
kg
-1
day
-1
were
efficacious for enhancing strength and body
composition changes in college strength/power
athletes. In addition, elevated protein intakes in
combination with resistance training were also shown
not to alter resting hormonal concentrations.
Jo
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition©. A National Library of Congress Indexed Journal. ISSN # 1550-2783
f the International Society of Sports Nutrition©. A National Library of Congress Indexed Journal. ISSN # 1550-2783


guestbook
Subject :


Email :


Message :


Privacy Policy | Code of Conduct | Links